Although it's an awesome program most of it isn't necessary to users of DAM software, where library management and batch processing is king.Ĭareful who you call idiots on here, please, especially when you come across as having no idea about what you so easily dismiss. 'Learning' photoshop doesn't a genius make. Mostly grumpy technophobes who love nothing more than tweaking images to death, one by one, slowly, and safely.įile management and Bridge don't really go together seeing as bridge is really just a portal to your own file management. I made a lot of money a few years ago, teaching dinosaurs like you how to use modern software to improve your workflow. Learn how to use your tools instead of settling for the "idiot version" people! I consider Lightroom and Aperture applications for the computer illiterate among us in the trade. I'm a photographer who learned how to use Photoshop and do all my file management in Bridge. I've been on Mac for well over 15 years and I know system software well enough. The top iMac can handle Maya, AutoCAD and the like extremely well. Not make excuses here but to be honest about it you don't really need a Mac Pro to do any heavy work.
I'm finding that more "Apple enthusiasts" tend to have this annoyance. Music and movie studios don't seem to be crying foul with Apple nor do large corporations of the arts that use Macs and Adobe certainly feels their professional software is still worth coding on Mac rather than making crap ports. that still get everything they need to get from Apple.
I love apple, but not as a professional anymore.Well there are a lot of "professionals" or people who call themselves that.:rolleyes. Sure, lots of posts about Apple giving the pros the backseat - but isn't it becoming super clear? FCPX, Mac Pros with super long refresh cycles, and Aperture showing its age years ago. Now the disparity is really becoming clear. 3 Years on Aperture 3! I waited and waited, and moved to Lightroom a few months ago.
0 kommentar(er)
